View Poll Results: Should stickerless cubes be allowed in competition? Your opinion?

Voters
396. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, stickerless cubes should be allowed in competition

    241 60.86%
  • No, they should not

    125 31.57%
  • No opinion

    30 7.58%
Page 36 of 51 FirstFirst ... 26343536373846 ... LastLast
Results 351 to 360 of 504

Thread: Should stickerless cubes be allowed in WCA competition?

  1. #351
    Member 5BLD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    England
    WCA Profile
    2011LAUA01
    YouTube
    5BLD
    Posts
    2,997

    Default

    A fast cuber should be able to see what the hidden edge is on a nonstickerless cube simply by look ahead.

    Even I can from just lookahead know whats on BL/BR/ even DB which is not a hidden edge but actually a blind spot
    (a^b)^c = a^(b c) e^(2 i pi c floor(1/2-(Im(b log(a)))/(2 pi)))
    I've been cubing for only just over 2 years and I feel old already

  2. #352
    Forever Slow Cubenovice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Vlaams-Brabant (Belgium)
    Posts
    2,171

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cfelicella View Post
    The main reason why I think many people want to use sticker less cubes, is that it's so much smoother compared to a regular stickered cube. Sticker less cubes are made ABS plastic whereas stickered cubes are made with ABS mixed PBC. I do see why they're illegal. Elite cubers defiantly would have an advantage by possibly knowing what colours the hidden edges or corners are. Overall, I think it should be used only for blindfolding, and the rules should stay the way they are.
    Whut?
    Whut?
    Not this again...
    [23:23] <+Kirjava> it's hard to do what I do if you're not ****ing insane
    I accidentily a 3rd line

  3. #353
    Member mDiPalma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Troy, NY
    Posts
    682

    Default

    yo dude

    if im memoing for a blindsolve on a stickerless, can't i rotate the U layer 20 degrees and memo fazter?
    1/100 : 12.76/18.99 zzoh; Tge è quai?

  4. #354

    Default

    On top of all that, if you really think you will be at a large disadvantage by not using a stickerless cube, feel free to go buy one.

    Quote Originally Posted by mDiPalma View Post
    yo dude

    if im memoing for a blindsolve on a stickerless, can't i rotate the U layer 20 degrees and memo fazter?
    Technically yes, its only a turn when you get to 45.0001 degrees. Might want to clear with the judge first though.
    Last edited by Brest; 08-08-2012 at 06:44 PM. Reason: post merge
    3x3 = 0:15.37 ------- 4x4 = 1:15.60 ------- 5x5 = 2:38 ------- 7x7 = 8:16
    "No method makes you cool, but Cfop makes you uncool." - applemobile

  5. #355
    Member Endgame's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Up Norf
    WCA Profile
    2012HOFF02
    YouTube
    EndgameNL
    Posts
    383

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cfelicella View Post
    The main reason why I think many people want to use sticker less cubes, is that it's so much smoother compared to a regular stickered cube. Sticker less cubes are made ABS plastic whereas stickered cubes are made with ABS mixed PBC. I do see why they're illegal. Elite cubers defiantly would have an advantage by possibly knowing what colours the hidden edges or corners are. Overall, I think it should be used only for blindfolding, and the rules should stay the way they are.
    Welcome to 2012, where PVC is spelled PBC and opinions are objective.
    oi fam

  6. #356
    Premium Member theZcuber's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Central NY, US
    WCA Profile
    2012PRAT02
    Posts
    1,805

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hunter View Post
    Technically yes, its only a turn when you get to 45.0001 degrees. Might want to clear with the judge first though.
    Not quite. The regs only define that at the end of the solve. IMO (as mentioned earlier in the thread) the judge should DNF you if you keep doing turns during memo (even <45)
    RPG (CFOP and Roux) - CubingStats
    WCA - CubingUSA - canadianCUBING - UKCA
    RPG and CubingStats can be useful, try them out!

  7. #357
    Member mDiPalma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Troy, NY
    Posts
    682

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by theZcuber View Post
    Not quite. The regs only define that at the end of the solve. IMO (as mentioned earlier in the thread) the judge should DNF you if you keep doing turns during memo (even <45)
    this is exactly my point. which is an easier regulation to enforce during blindsolving: NO STICKERLESS CUBES ...or... NO TURNING ANY SIDE OF THE CUBE ANY APPRECIABLE AMOUNT TO BE DETERMINED BY JUDGE'S DISCRETION DURING BLINDFOLD MEMORIZATION?

    in my opinion, we should either universally allow stickerless, or universally ban them. any wishy-washy compromise between 3x3, OH, feet, and BLD is entirely halfwitted.
    1/100 : 12.76/18.99 zzoh; Tge è quai?

  8. #358
    Premium Member Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Kearny, NJ, USA
    WCA Profile
    2003BURT01
    Posts
    1,296

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mDiPalma View Post
    this is exactly my point. which is an easier regulation to enforce during blindsolving: NO STICKERLESS CUBES ...or... NO TURNING ANY SIDE OF THE CUBE ANY APPRECIABLE AMOUNT TO BE DETERMINED BY JUDGE'S DISCRETION DURING BLINDFOLD MEMORIZATION?

    in my opinion, we should either universally allow stickerless, or universally ban them. any wishy-washy compromise between 3x3, OH, feet, and BLD is entirely halfwitted.
    They were never supposed to be allowed. When they were made legal for BLD, it was an oversight.
    I'm Bob Burton. Maybe you've heard of me. http://www.cubewhiz.com

  9. #359
    Premium Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Boston, MA
    WCA Profile
    2005REYN01
    YouTube
    timbreynolds
    Posts
    894

    Default

    I don't care that it's hard to utilize the advantage that stickerless cubes provide. It's an advantage, you can see extra information from certain angles. Just because people haven't been taking advantage of that information doesn't mean it's not there.

    The WCA regulations have, for years, set a very clear and sensible rule that extra information can't be provided. If we allow stickerless cubes, that rule is gone, and we have to come up with a new definition of "some extra information but not too much". What's more information than regular cubes but less information that stickerless cubes? Those should be legal, right?

  10. #360
    Member qqwref's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    a <script> tag near you
    WCA Profile
    2006GOTT01
    YouTube
    qqwref2
    Posts
    6,424

    Default

    I dunno, it's hard to say. Maybe there is extra information, but I've used 4x4s and megaminxes (both Mefferts) in competition that had thick enough tiles to give you extra info, and nobody complained. I guess I just don't see being able to see extra stickers as a problem.
    Computer cube PB averages of 12: [Clock: 5.72] [Pyraminx: 3.44] [Megaminx: 49.52]
    [2x2: 2.66] [3x3: 8.71] [4x4: 29.06] [5x5: 52.69] [6x6: 1:34.78] [7x7: 2:20.34]

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •