A fast cuber should be able to see what the hidden edge is on a nonstickerless cube simply by look ahead.
Even I can from just lookahead know whats on BL/BR/ even DB which is not a hidden edge but actually a blind spot
Yes, stickerless cubes should be allowed in competition
No, they should not
No opinion
A fast cuber should be able to see what the hidden edge is on a nonstickerless cube simply by look ahead.
Even I can from just lookahead know whats on BL/BR/ even DB which is not a hidden edge but actually a blind spot
yo dude
if im memoing for a blindsolve on a stickerless, can't i rotate the U layer 20 degrees and memo fazter?
Last edited by Brest; 08-08-2012 at 06:44 PM. Reason: post merge
this is exactly my point. which is an easier regulation to enforce during blindsolving: NO STICKERLESS CUBES ...or... NO TURNING ANY SIDE OF THE CUBE ANY APPRECIABLE AMOUNT TO BE DETERMINED BY JUDGE'S DISCRETION DURING BLINDFOLD MEMORIZATION?
in my opinion, we should either universally allow stickerless, or universally ban them. any wishy-washy compromise between 3x3, OH, feet, and BLD is entirely halfwitted.
I don't care that it's hard to utilize the advantage that stickerless cubes provide. It's an advantage, you can see extra information from certain angles. Just because people haven't been taking advantage of that information doesn't mean it's not there.
The WCA regulations have, for years, set a very clear and sensible rule that extra information can't be provided. If we allow stickerless cubes, that rule is gone, and we have to come up with a new definition of "some extra information but not too much". What's more information than regular cubes but less information that stickerless cubes? Those should be legal, right?
I dunno, it's hard to say. Maybe there is extra information, but I've used 4x4s and megaminxes (both Mefferts) in competition that had thick enough tiles to give you extra info, and nobody complained. I guess I just don't see being able to see extra stickers as a problem.
Bookmarks