"NEW" Race to Sub-30!

[AvidCuber]

I can't understand why so many people with 25-28 avgs post here! Go to the race to sub-20 !

Some of them have above-30 solves in those averages, they want to be consistently sub-30. (that's my guess)

[Rayne]

I can't understand why so many people with 25-28 avgs post here! Go to the race to sub-20 !

Well I wanted to graduate from this because I started in the old thread when i was just above 30, but it got taken down so now I have to get 3 sub 30s in this thread, when I already got 2 in the old thread.

[Monarch]

33.25

(22.70)
40.63
30.69
25.35
(43.40+)
39.98
40.32
34.10
30.30
35.13
27.59
28.45

Not very consistent.

[lorki3]

Round 3

Statistics for 06-07-2010 12:34:14

Average: 31.94
Standard Deviation: 3.24
Best Time: 26.69
Worst Time: 45.00
Individual Times:

1. 37.48
2. 38.58
3. 29.23
4. 33.81
5. (45.00)
6. 28.88
7. 27.47
8. (26.69)
9. 33.31
10. 29.96
11. 30.52
12. 30.17

[Akuma]

I can't understand why so many people with 25-28 avgs post here! Go to the race to sub-20 !

While I completely agree with your point in my case I hit sub-30 averages barely a week ago so I do still have a reason to hang around in here I guess. I occasionally do single solves well over 30 seconds, HOWEVER I do see some people in here who do constant single sub-30 solves whose presence in this therad is inexcusable.

If you do constant sub-30 solves you really have nothing to do in this thread.

[AvidCuber]

32.38

36.37, 36.58, 36.30, 36.16, 31.34, (24.46), 39.63, 27.62, 27.62, 31.72, (55.81 [POP]), 32.15

Haha, I did not warm up at all for this (I had printed the scrambles the night before and then I woke up this morning and did the average), that would perhaps explain why there was a (fairly) steady improvement as the average wore on.

Kinda weird that there were two 27.62's, but w/e.

I think my vacation did not help me improve...

[Carson]

Round Three Results

[Owen]

Isn't the most recent round batch 4?

[Carson]

Round 4
Potential Closing Time - June 11, 2010 || 4:00PM EST

Scrambles

1. L2 R2 F R D L F' D U' L R' D' U2 R2 D' U' L2 F' L' R F D2 U' L R'
2. L R D B' F2 L' B2 L' R D2 L2 B2 F' L U' L' F L R' B2 F L B' F U2
3. U L2 B2 F R' D2 U B L' R D B' L' R U' L R2 F' R' B' F' D L F D2
4. L' D2 L' F D' U2 F2 U' B2 L' D2 R' D2 U' B' F D L D U2 B2 L R' D2 L
5. B2 L U2 B2 F L' U R' U2 F' D F L2 D' L' F R D L R2 U B' F2 L R'
6. D2 U' L B2 D U' F' D' U' R F2 L' R2 B' F2 D' R2 B2 L R2 D F L' R2 B
7. D U' R2 F L2 F R' D U2 B' F' L2 D R2 F2 D' U' F L R' B' U' B2 F L
8. L' B' F' L' R2 B F D U L R' B2 F' D U B2 D U2 B2 F2 L R D2 R2 B'
9. B2 F' U L R2 B L2 B' F2 U' L2 R B L' D U B' F2 L D' B L' U B2 D'
10. D' U' R2 D' L2 R' B F L D' U R2 D2 U2 L2 R' D2 L R' B' D L D F L'
11. B' D' U B' L' U' L R B2 L D U' F' L' B2 F2 L R2 F' D U B2 L' R2 U2
12. L R2 B U R2 U' B2 L2 R' D U' B F D F R2 F' L U' B2 R B' D2 U L

[Carson]

Isn't the most recent round batch 4?

If by "the most recent", you mean the one's posted after you posted that... then Yes... otherwise, no.