Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 45

Thread: Algorithm Database Discussion

  1. #21
    Member Ranzha V. Emodrach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    San Jose, California, United States
    WCA Profile
    2009HARN01
    YouTube
    RanzhaTheLoneCuber
    Posts
    1,741

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cride5 View Post
    ELL images on the dev version look like this:


    But if you'd like I could add a view option to make them appear like this:
    You did it again XP.
    Lol. No worries.


    Sounds great! I think either would be okay. I sincerely think that the former one is better for those who use ELL first, if any.
    Overall, I think | Skewb
    Having sigs allow three lines | 3x3: ~13
    Isn't a huge deal. | Skewb: ~7

  2. #22
    Member miniGOINGS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Winnipeg MB Canada
    WCA Profile
    2010GOIN01
    YouTube
    miniGOINGS
    Posts
    3,057

    Default

    Here we go.

    http://www.ai.univ-paris8.fr/~bh/cube/

    When dealing with LL solutions for EO, EP, CO, and CP here are the optimal movecounts;

    Fridrich (OLL + PLL)
    9.22 + 11.21 = 20.43

    Backwards (PLL + OLL)
    8.1 + 12.8 = 20.9

    Corners (CLL + ELL)
    9.18 + 11.27 = 20.45

    Edges (ELL + CLL)
    7.87 + 11.73 = 19.6

    1LLL (LL)
    12.58
    Personal Records | 2x2: 6.03, 8.84 | 3x3: 18.08, 24.06 | 4x4: 1:19.33

  3. #23
    Member Ranzha V. Emodrach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    San Jose, California, United States
    WCA Profile
    2009HARN01
    YouTube
    RanzhaTheLoneCuber
    Posts
    1,741

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by miniGOINGS View Post
    Here we go.

    http://www.ai.univ-paris8.fr/~bh/cube/

    When dealing with LL solutions for EO, EP, CO, and CP here are the optimal movecounts;

    Fridrich (OLL + PLL)
    9.22 + 11.21 = 20.43

    Backwards (PLL + OLL)
    8.1 + 12.8 = 20.9

    Corners (CLL + ELL)
    9.18 + 11.27 = 20.45

    Edges (ELL + CLL)
    7.87 + 11.73 = 19.6

    1LLL (LL)
    12.58
    It's interesting that Backwards, the inverse of the preferred Fridrich LL system, has a negative effect on the movecount, whereas the preferred CLL + ELL is worse than Fridrich and its inverse, ELL + CLL, has a sub-20 movecount.

    I'mma try this!
    Overall, I think | Skewb
    Having sigs allow three lines | 3x3: ~13
    Isn't a huge deal. | Skewb: ~7

  4. #24
    Member miniGOINGS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Winnipeg MB Canada
    WCA Profile
    2010GOIN01
    YouTube
    miniGOINGS
    Posts
    3,057

    Default

    Mhm. I'm not sure in which metric the movecounts were generated with, but I think I should find out.
    Personal Records | 2x2: 6.03, 8.84 | 3x3: 18.08, 24.06 | 4x4: 1:19.33

  5. #25
    Not Alot Kenneth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Kauparve, Hejde, Gotland, Sweden
    WCA Profile
    2005GUST01
    YouTube
    Kubbuth
    Posts
    1,702

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ranzha V. Emodrach View Post
    ... and its inverse, ELL + CLL, has a sub-20 movecount
    Sounds fine but is much worse than it looks, it is low because ELL first is way easy, almost intuitive and have short algs and I think 14 cases but CLL last is horrible, many have long algs and it is around 80 cases (1:6 of ZBLL), absolutly nobody uses it because of that.

    I was learning that once, or... I was using a method that did VHF2L, EP + 1 corner and then the last three corners. then I was planning to expand to 2 steps, learned a few cases but found it was so many of them... I choosed to do CLL/ELL instead and later switched to COLL (because I hated to see oriented edges flip during CLL).
    Last edited by Kenneth; 05-05-2010 at 01:43 PM.

  6. #26
    Member miniGOINGS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Winnipeg MB Canada
    WCA Profile
    2010GOIN01
    YouTube
    miniGOINGS
    Posts
    3,057

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kenneth View Post
    Sounds fine but is much worse than it looks, it is low because ELL first is way easy, almost intuitive and have short algs and I think 14 cases but CLL last is horrible, many have long algs and it is around 80 cases (1:6 of ZBLL), absolutly nobody uses it because of that.

    I was learning that once, or... I was using a method that did VHF2L, EP + 1 corner and then the last three corners. then I was planning to expand to 2 steps, learned a few cases but found it was so many of them... I choosed to do CLL/ELL instead and later switched to COLL (because I hated to see oriented edges flip during CLL).
    Actually, it doesn't look like it.

    "permutation and orientation of edges (13 configurations, average : 7.87),
    then permutation and orientation of corners (42 configurations, average : 11.73)."

    Doesn't sound too bad to me.
    Last edited by Kenneth; 05-07-2010 at 01:05 PM. Reason: oops, clicked edit instead of qoute and wrote my answer into this post :P
    Personal Records | 2x2: 6.03, 8.84 | 3x3: 18.08, 24.06 | 4x4: 1:19.33

  7. #27
    Premium Member Cride5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Scotland
    WCA Profile
    2009RIDE01
    Posts
    1,195

    Default

    OK, an update has been made to the alg database. The following updates were made:

    1. BUGFIX: Swap CLS + ELS
    2. BUGFIX: Sorted out COLL/CLL/ELL plan view
    3. FEATURE: "add" link on view pages, for ease of access
    4. FEATURE: Allow removal of individual algs (currently admin only)
    5. FEATURE: Improved parsing of user input to allow: "`", "R'2" and "Rw"
    6. BUGFIX: Fixed verification problem for algs ending in x2 rotations
    7. FEATURE: Improved duplicate detection, for duplicate algs posted with different rotations
    8. FEATURE: Bulk algorithm upload
    9. FEATURE: Link to alg.garron.us for algorithm animations
    10. FEATURE: Initial rotations in separate column, final rotations hidden
    11. FEATURE: All AUFs automatically replaced with y rotations for LL algs

    I've also re-processed the ZBLL and COLL algs to change AUFs for rotations, so that the move-count stats are better.

    For more details on updates and planned features, click here.

    If you want any features that aren't in the ToDo-list please let me know below...
    3x3(ZZ): a12 16.73, pb 11.22 nl | 2x2(Guimond): a12 5.27, pb 3.40 nl | FM a12 30.1, pb 21
    Or you can just use the Wiki .. or cTimer .. or VisualCube

  8. #28
    Not Alot Kenneth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Kauparve, Hejde, Gotland, Sweden
    WCA Profile
    2005GUST01
    YouTube
    Kubbuth
    Posts
    1,702

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by miniGOINGS View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kenneth View Post
    Sounds fine but is much worse than it looks, it is low because ELL first is way easy, almost intuitive and have short algs and I think 14 cases but CLL last is horrible, many have long algs and it is around 80 cases (1:6 of ZBLL), absolutly nobody uses it because of that.

    I was learning that once, or... I was using a method that did VHF2L, EP + 1 corner and then the last three corners. then I was planning to expand to 2 steps, learned a few cases but found it was so many of them... I choosed to do CLL/ELL instead and later switched to COLL (because I hated to see oriented edges flip during CLL).
    Actually, it doesn't look like it.

    "permutation and orientation of edges (13 configurations, average : 7.87),
    then permutation and orientation of corners (42 configurations, average : 11.73)."

    Doesn't sound too bad to me.
    Can't be correct, 27 orientations times 12 permutations divied by 4 makes a total of 81
    Last edited by Kenneth; 05-07-2010 at 01:07 PM.

  9. #29
    Member miniGOINGS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Winnipeg MB Canada
    WCA Profile
    2010GOIN01
    YouTube
    miniGOINGS
    Posts
    3,057

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kenneth View Post
    Can't be correct, 27 orientations times 12 permutations divied by 4 makes a total of 81
    Yea, it does sound strange. I'll look into it.
    Personal Records | 2x2: 6.03, 8.84 | 3x3: 18.08, 24.06 | 4x4: 1:19.33

  10. #30
    Member Ranzha V. Emodrach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    San Jose, California, United States
    WCA Profile
    2009HARN01
    YouTube
    RanzhaTheLoneCuber
    Posts
    1,741

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cride5 View Post
    OK, an update has been made to the alg database. The following updates were made:

    1. BUGFIX: Swap CLS + ELS
    2. BUGFIX: Sorted out COLL/CLL/ELL plan view
    3. FEATURE: "add" link on view pages, for ease of access
    4. FEATURE: Allow removal of individual algs (currently admin only)
    5. FEATURE: Improved parsing of user input to allow: "`", "R'2" and "Rw"
    6. BUGFIX: Fixed verification problem for algs ending in x2 rotations
    7. FEATURE: Improved duplicate detection, for duplicate algs posted with different rotations
    8. FEATURE: Bulk algorithm upload
    9. FEATURE: Link to alg.garron.us for algorithm animations
    10. FEATURE: Initial rotations in separate column, final rotations hidden
    11. FEATURE: All AUFs automatically replaced with y rotations for LL algs

    I've also re-processed the ZBLL and COLL algs to change AUFs for rotations, so that the move-count stats are better.

    For more details on updates and planned features, click here.

    If you want any features that aren't in the ToDo-list please let me know below...
    Thanks SO MUCH for this. This is way much and a HUGE improvement.
    Overall, I think | Skewb
    Having sigs allow three lines | 3x3: ~13
    Isn't a huge deal. | Skewb: ~7

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •