Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Chance of dissassembling a cube to solve it

  1. #1
    Member Feryll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    WCA Profile
    2010KELM01
    Posts
    541

    Default Chance of dissassembling a cube to solve it

    As per the thread title, I saw the thread here and wondered "What about the chance of taking pieces out and randomly placing them in spots? I am in no way sure of if my work is correct, but whatever.
    Spoiler:
    This is first assuming that you can take the middle pieces out. There are 6! different combinations of how to put on the centers from one angle. But many are the same but just from another angle. This reduces it by a factor of 2(6), so the number drops to 60.
    There are 8! different places to put the corners on, and that is multiplied by the flip coefficient (or whatever) of 3 different flips and 8 places the flips occur, so 3^8. That gives us 8! x 3^8. But as before, there are 24 clones per the actual number, so it becomes (8! x 3^8)/24, or 7! x 3^7.
    There are 12! different places to place the edges, with 2 flips, so it becomes 12! x 2^12. But once again, there are clones in that calculation. There are 24different places to use as your point of view when looking at a cube (Don't say it's only six, because you can rotate any face 4 times), so it's reduced by a factor of 24. So the number becomes (12! x 2 ^ 12)/24, or 11! x 2^11.
    Finally, it's time to multiply 60 (centers) by 11,022,480 (corners) by 81,749,606,400 (edges). If you divide it by the 4.3 quintillion possibilities, this yields a "1 in 9.6 chance" or 10.4%.

    But the thing is, I thought it was a 1 in twelve chance. If anybody could find an error in my proof (using my method, not the orientated and permeated simple one), I'd be grateful And you get the opportunity to facepalm me!
    3x3x3 PB: 12.34 sec NL PB: 13.13 sec Averaging: sub-20 secs
    I'm slow and I'm proud of it. Christian Cuber

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    WCA Profile
    2007GOUL01
    YouTube
    cardologist
    Posts
    4,298

    Default

    Well, it's cos you also counted centres, which "don't come off".
    #

  3. #3
    Member Cyrus C.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    IOWA
    WCA Profile
    2010COLA01
    YouTube
    CyroKarat
    Posts
    2,176

    Default

    I got:

    Spoiler:
    1/2 chance of EO
    1/3 Chance of CO
    1/2 Chance of EP
    1/1 Chance sf CP
    1/12 Chance of solvable cube.


    I don't think there's any error in your proof, You just counted centers, & usually people don't take then off when dissambling the cube.
    Last edited by Cyrus C.; 01-13-2010 at 01:51 PM.
    <3 4x4x4: 1/5/12/100 44.92/49.94/52.01/56.71
    "4x4x4 is the only event that matters." - Christopher Olson

  4. #4
    Premium Member Micael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    WCA Profile
    2009BOUL03
    YouTube
    mboulet24
    Posts
    628

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyrus C. View Post
    I got:

    Spoiler:
    1/2 chance of EO
    1/3 Chance of CO
    1/2 Chance of EP
    1/1 Chance sf CP
    1/12 Chance of solvable cube.


    I don't think there's any error in your proof, You just counted centers, & usually people don't take then off when dissambling the cube.
    I think this is correct. This is 8.3% (1/12). So I do not believe 10.4% is correct because it should reduce the chance if you also remove center caps.

  5. #5
    mod Sa967St's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Oakville, Ontario, Canada
    WCA Profile
    2007STRO01
    YouTube
    Sa967St
    Posts
    3,336

    Default

    Spoiler:
    Quote Originally Posted by http://www.ryanheise.com/cube/cube_laws.html
    An interesting fact about Rubik's Cube is that if you take it apart and put it together randomly, there will be only a 1 in 12 chance of it actually being solvable by legal moves (that is, without taking the cube apart again).
    ...
    Combining these laws, only 1/12 (1/2 * 1/2 * 1/3) of the conceivable cube states are reachable by legal moves.
    ^that
    Speedskewbin
    My website: COLL, ELL, CPEOLL, CLS, Square-1 EPs, Skewb Algs, PLL Recognition, and more.
    "ohai I'm sela and I don't rike fluffy pillows because they're too fluffy" - Chester Lian

  6. #6
    Member Cyrus C.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    IOWA
    WCA Profile
    2010COLA01
    YouTube
    CyroKarat
    Posts
    2,176

    Default

    Let me try with centers:

    Spoiler:
    1/12 EO CO EP
    1/64 CP
    1/768 Total


    I feel like that number is way too low, did I do something wrong?
    <3 4x4x4: 1/5/12/100 44.92/49.94/52.01/56.71
    "4x4x4 is the only event that matters." - Christopher Olson

  7. #7
    Member Thomas09's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    YouTube
    Tok169
    Posts
    544

    Default

    The answer is 42.
    All your cube are belong to us.

  8. #8
    Member Feryll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    WCA Profile
    2010KELM01
    Posts
    541

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyrus C. View Post
    Let me try with centers:

    Spoiler:
    1/12 EO CO EP
    1/64 CP
    1/768 Total


    I feel like that number is way too low, did I do something wrong?
    Actually, its 1/60 for centers. The answer probably is 1/12 x 1/60, or 1/720. I just wonder where I went wrong...
    Actually, I counted centers because in a truly mathematical problem, the model would probably have removable centers. And if you're 4x4x4 fell apart completely (like my storeRIPOFFbought), it would be useful info. I don't know anything about 4x4 BLD, so I don't know how to simply go about the 4x4's chance of dissassembling.
    3x3x3 PB: 12.34 sec NL PB: 13.13 sec Averaging: sub-20 secs
    I'm slow and I'm proud of it. Christian Cuber

  9. #9
    Alot of Azure Logan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Veelox
    WCA Profile
    2009KELL02
    YouTube
    ljrox123
    Posts
    847

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thomas09 View Post
    The answer is 42.
    yep.
    3x3: PB: 19.74 non-lucky!! / 3x3 Avg of 5: 23.41 | Currently learning BLD!... HELP?! | Finally an official sub-30 avg!! | "When in doubt, J-Perm it out!" -Mini and I

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    WCA Profile
    2007GOUL01
    YouTube
    cardologist
    Posts
    4,298

    Default

    Chances of a solvable 4x4 = chances that CO is correct.
    #

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •