TDM
Member
For ZZ users: L2 F2 D F2 L2 B2 U2 L2 U2 F2 U2 R F2 R2 D' L2 F R' B2 R2 U'
L2 R2 D2 U' B2 L2 U F2 L2 U2 B' D' R2 F2 D L' U2 R U' on 3x3
Very easy X-cross on white
x2 // InspectionU B2 L2 B2 U' R2 U' R2 U' B2 R2 F D' B' R B' U F' L' F' D' U'
When I first attempted it, I had some amazing solution that included something like:R2 U' F2 L2 D B2 U' B2 L2 U B' U' R' D F' U2 F' R' B' L' D2
z2
F' D' U' L F D'
Fail 1.18, would've been even slower if I hadn't known there was an easy solution.0.93 F U R' U' F2 U' F' R' U'
[AUF] l' U R D' R' U' l B [AUF] // OCLL w/ PLL skip (you'd almost certainly know it as a ZBLL)
But I can't reconstruct. I think I might have misscrambled, which is annoying because it was such a good solution.
Yeah, I don't know any COLLs for L. I only know that if the two stickers facing U are opposites, it could be solved, but not always. And if they're the same it's sometimes diagswap, sometimes not.I use F' r U R' U' L' U l. It's just the inverse of my standard OLL from the case, I also used it as COLL before I started learning ZBLL, I only know that and two other cases from the COLL subset.
Another easy EO: B2 D2 F2 L2 F2 D' R2 U2 B2 R2 D' L D' L2 F2 U L R2 FFor ZZ users: L2 F2 D F2 L2 B2 U2 L2 U2 F2 U2 R F2 R2 D' L2 F R' B2 R2 U'
(although now I look at this, I can't see anything easy about it - maybe I misscrambled?)
356 0.51 F2 U R2 F R2 U2 R2 F
358 0.48 R2 U2 F2 U2 R2 F2 U' F2
361 0.82 R' U2 F R F U R2 U'
Within 6 solves... so close to having two counting sub-1s in one Ao5.
lol 2x2 scramble U' R U R U
167. 0.29 U' F2 U'
Good point, I forgot about that. I'll say my PB is 0.53 from early March (F R' F' R F'; easy SS -> predicted PBL skip. I've deleted all the 4 move or less scrambles from Prisma).Are you counting a 3 move scramble?