Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: V-cube 4 (Made In China)

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member 04mucklowd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Virginia Water, Surrey, UK
    WCA Profile
    2009MUCK01
    YouTube
    04mucklowd
    Posts
    740

    Default V-cube 4 (Made In China)



    I dont know what to say...

    It does the core lock up
    Last edited by DavidWoner; 11-15-2009 at 09:48 AM.

  2. #2
    Premium Member Muesli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sheffield, UK
    WCA Profile
    2009SMIT05
    YouTube
    musli4brekkies
    Posts
    1,746

    Default

    Looks kind of mediocre. Why did they not fix the misalignment?
    My team sucks.

  3. #3
    Member 04mucklowd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Virginia Water, Surrey, UK
    WCA Profile
    2009MUCK01
    YouTube
    04mucklowd
    Posts
    740

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Musli4brekkies View Post
    Looks kind of mediocre. Why did they not fix the misalignment?
    Its not made by V-cube
    And I think that there is some sort of clicking going on

  4. #4
    Premium Member LNZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Adelaide, SA
    YouTube
    Darkangel2347
    Posts
    472

    Default

    I saw the video and it is not good. Given there are many 4x4 cube makers out there, this one is not good. So I won't buy it.
    Parity fix on a 1x1x1 cube: U U' D D' L L' R R' F F' B B'

  5. #5
    Member qqwref's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    a <script> tag near you
    WCA Profile
    2006GOTT01
    YouTube
    qqwref2
    Posts
    6,330

    Default

    It seems to have the clicks and core misalignment, same as the official V-6. I would have thought this problem would be obvious to the KO manufacturers. This 4x4 type doesn't look like it has the potential to even equal the best 4x4s on the market. (I hope that if Verdes produces a real V-4 it will be significantly better than this.)
    Computer cube PB averages of 12: [Clock: 5.72] [Pyraminx: 3.44] [Megaminx: 49.52]
    [2x2: 2.66] [3x3: 8.71] [4x4: 29.06] [5x5: 52.69] [6x6: 1:34.78] [7x7: 2:20.34]

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    59

    Default

    I bet you can do the Pi mod to it and make it better than a QJ.
    Pepsi>Coke :) Space Needle FTW!!!
    Nvm what I said about TaiYan BREAK IT IN, THEN ITS BEAST

  7. #7

    Default

    Ugh, I was mad enough when he uploaded the video, but can we stop posting this stuff on this forum? I know, it's interesting to hear about it, but promoting it will also generate the wrong kind of interest.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    WCA Profile
    2008JUKK01
    YouTube
    Talvikoala
    Posts
    429

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Me Myself & Pi View Post
    Ugh, I was mad enough when he uploaded the video, but can we stop posting this stuff on this forum? I know, it's interesting to hear about it, but promoting it will also generate the wrong kind of interest.
    So people shouldn't have a right to choose?

  9. #9
    Member qqwref's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    a <script> tag near you
    WCA Profile
    2006GOTT01
    YouTube
    qqwref2
    Posts
    6,330

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Me Myself & Pi View Post
    Ugh, I was mad enough when he uploaded the video, but can we stop posting this stuff on this forum? I know, it's interesting to hear about it, but promoting it will also generate the wrong kind of interest.
    No. I do not want speedsolving to become like twistypuzzles is when it comes to knockoffs... Over there, any links to knockoffs, and almost any information about them, is quickly deleted. That's simply not an environment that would be at all helpful for a speedsolving community - we are interested in knowing about the BEST cubes, whether it is an official puzzle or a knockoff, and restricting the flow of information cannot possibly help us towards that goal.
    Computer cube PB averages of 12: [Clock: 5.72] [Pyraminx: 3.44] [Megaminx: 49.52]
    [2x2: 2.66] [3x3: 8.71] [4x4: 29.06] [5x5: 52.69] [6x6: 1:34.78] [7x7: 2:20.34]

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Me Myself & Pi View Post
    Ugh, I was mad enough when he uploaded the video, but can we stop posting this stuff on this forum? I know, it's interesting to hear about it, but promoting it will also generate the wrong kind of interest.
    If they can bring out the puzzles faster and cheaper than Verdes can, and for comparable price/quality, why not buy them? Preventing third parties from creating these puzzles is just anti-competitive, not to mention stopping the community from being able to access something awesome like the 9x9x9 or 11x11x11.

    Also how is this any different to say, C4U 3x3x3 cubes? They're basically knockoffs of the Rubik's Cube. Just because the patent has expired (I think...) on the Rubik's Cube, does that mean it is moral to make copies? And vice versa, was it immoral to make copies before the patent expired just because someone (the government patent system) said so?

    EDIT: Does anyone know what the dimensions of the V4 would be?
    Last edited by aronpm; 11-16-2009 at 01:37 AM. Reason: amendment

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •