• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 40,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

JonnyWhoopes

Premium Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
1,009
Location
Massachusetts, USA
WCA
2011GRAY02
YouTube
Visit Channel
Uhh... It's a bit like K4, but more Rouxy. I haven't decided on specific steps just yet as I do edge pairing at weird stages. In that average I did L12E. Like K4LL but for Roux last six edges.

However i sometimes find it easier to edge pair just before the second block....

It sounds like you just described Stadler at first, and then Meyer after that. Remember guys, just because you've never seen a method used before doesn't mean it doesn't already exist.

Also, I use Meyer. F2C, FB, Centers, Edge pairing, SB, CMLL, LSE, Pure parities if needed.
 

5BLD

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2011
Messages
3,179
Location
England
WCA
2011LAUA01
YouTube
Visit Channel
It sounds like you just described Stadler at first, and then Meyer after that. Remember guys, just because you've never seen a method used before doesn't mean it doesn't already exist.

Also, I use Meyer. F2C, FB, Centers, Edge pairing, SB, CMLL, LSE, Pure parities if needed.

Hm. Meyer sounds similar to a variation I was trying out.
Yes, I meant to say 'discovered' not 'invented'...


Edit: but my original idea which I'm still using is different to both Stadler and Meyer.
 
Last edited:

RCTACameron

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2010
Messages
1,597
Location
Melbourne, Australia
WCA
2010STOL01
YouTube
Visit Channel
2.08, 2.25, 2.43, 2.44, 2.31, (1.96), (2.50), 2.28, 2.28, 2.33, 2.15, 1.97 = 2.25 2x2 average of 12 with only 1 sub-2. :p PB is 2.15.

Edit: 2.66, 2.00, 3.69, 2.03, 1.86, 2.71, 1.59, 2.13, 3.03, 1.93, 2.52, 2.05, 2.06, 2.81, (DNF(1.88)), 1.63, 2.86, 2.33, 2.27, 1.68, 2.19, 2.59, 2.88, 1.80, 2.05, 2.46, 2.69, 2.21, 2.83, 2.53, 2.61, 3.59, 2.55, 1.84, 2.19, (1.16), 2.11, 2.18, 3.02, 2.56, 3.16, 2.30, 2.77, 3.22, 3.80, 3.11, 2.61, 2.31, 2.25, 1.90 = 2.46 2x2 average of 50
This was hard to figure out, as qqtimer doesn't have an avg50 function. I don't usually count avg50, but it's sub-2.5 so it's good. I failed the avg100 (counting 7 and 9) and got 2.73. :(
 
Last edited:

5BLD

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2011
Messages
3,179
Location
England
WCA
2011LAUA01
YouTube
Visit Channel
M'U cycle in 1.67, PB. Because I never do it.

3x3 12.26 average of 5
Non lucky but still, they were strangely very good solves... I was actually trying to be efficient.
 
Last edited:

Florian

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2010
Messages
726
Location
Germany
WCA
2010KREY01
YouTube
Visit Channel
My 5th sub-8 and from all solves i have reconstructed it has the most tps.

1. 7.73 D B' F2 U' B' L2 B' R' D R B' U' B F D U L' U2 R F2 U' D' F L F

y
r' U' x' U' R2 (4)
U' R U2 R' U R U R'(8/12)
U' L' U L(4/16)
U2 R U R' U y' R' U' R'(8/24)
U F U R U' R' F' U' F R U R' U' F'(14/38)
R' U R' U' R' U' R' U R U R2 U2(12/50)

50/7.73=6.47 tps
 
H

Hershey

Guest
3x3 12.26 average of 5
Non lucky but still, they were strangely very good solves... I was actually trying to be efficient.

Either you are improving too fast, or Roux is just awesome like that.
 
Top