Actually I'm kinda surprised too. Because 1 month ago on the last time I met him, he averaging about 30-35 seconds. Then 2 weeks later he told me that he averaging sub 20 and got sub 10 PB.
Actually I'm kinda surprised too. Because 1 month ago on the last time I met him, he averaging about 30-35 seconds. Then 2 weeks later he told me that he averaging sub 20 and got sub 10 PB.
Idk.. with an easy scramble anything's possible but I mean this was just yea...I got a 10.22 with Erik's scramble but that doesn't mean anything because of how easy it was.. I myself average around 22 so yea...As for this, the reason I think it's fake is because of:
1: his reaction after the solve
2: the quick cut
3: His recognition of the PLL and execution (I don't think that even Breandan Vallence can recognize the PLL that fast...he can execute it that fast though)
4: How his F2L was only 4 seconds in the last solve yet around 12 seconds in the other solves
He could have seen the OLL skip coming, but that PLL recognition was ridiculous. I call hacks too.
okay, just for fun and self-amusement, heres a data lesson.
the chance of getting a specific time is
(Z score, which has a specific Z value which is a fraction) = (time) - (average) / (standard deviation)
Z = x - average / σ
Z = 5.87 - 14.982(the mean, not average) / 0.15
Z = -60.746667
if Z = -6, the chances of him getting it again is 1 out of 1014713328. his is 10 times higher. and LOL when i put it in my calculator it just said the chances of scoring 5.87 is 0 out of infinity :P
I think its safe to say, he wont ever get a sub 6 single in a long time!
Hmmm...
Well, he did pause ever so slightly during the last (?) pair, so who knows...
I'll call him safe for now, and give him the benefit of the doubt.
I might randomly change my mind because I'm jealous, though.
I CAN HAZ A HACK!!
cheater!
Bookmarks