Page 12 of 27 FirstFirst ... 2101112131422 ... LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 263

Thread: The OLL and PLL help thread

  1. #111
    Member soccerking813's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    734

    Default

    I learned Fridrich F2L around that time. I would suggest you learn it now also.
    3x315.01/22.76/24-25 2x24.01/~11 Mega.2:01/~3:00 Pyra.5.87/~14 Bump1:10.04/~1:45
    People who make fun of you will probably be living alone with their cats at 40 years old.

  2. #112
    statue
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Camp Hill, PA, USA
    WCA Profile
    2008KORI02
    YouTube
    StachuK1992
    Posts
    3,463

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by grama View Post
    the 60k question... what to learn first? F2L, OLL, PLL or HTML??.... difficult choice..

    getting serious, personally i started with intuitive F2L, then full PLL, then i learnt the 7 OLL of the cross, and now i'm starting to look into some "less intuitive" F2L cases to improve those.
    haha...that's exactly where I'm at!

    ontopic: Learn F2L(badmephisto's videos)

  3. #113
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Gainesville, Florida
    WCA Profile
    2008LOFT01
    YouTube
    Loftycuber
    Posts
    1,594

    Default

    Unless you plan on using Roux or CF or something then I think you should learn how to solve the F2L. But it looks like you can already do that.
    OH Records: Single: 9.xx Average of 12: 16.13 Average of 5: 15.03
    www.loftycuber.110mb.com

  4. #114
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lofty View Post
    you should learn how to solve the F2L. But it looks like you can already do that.
    How does it look like I can already do it?

  5. #115
    Member DAE_JA_VOO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Pretoria, South Africa
    Posts
    868

    Default

    I did Intuitive F2L and the PLLs at the same time. Worked fine for me
    I can solve a Rubik's Cube
    DAEJAVOO.com

  6. #116
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Miami, Florida
    Posts
    266

    Default

    You're probably going to get bigger improvements in your times by focusing on F2L until you "have it". Once you feel comfortable with F2L, memorizing the rest of the PLL algs will definitely shave some seconds off of your last layer.

    I would *definitely* do F2L first.

    Oh and PS: The other poster thinks you can already do F2L because in your original posting, you said your "first attempt with F2L and PLL" was around a 41 second solve.

    Brian.

  7. #117
    Member daniel0731ex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    WCA Profile
    2009HODA02
    YouTube
    daniel0731ex
    Posts
    2,307

    Default

    umm....im sub30 and im using LBL+2sOLL+2sPLL. don't want to use F2L

  8. #118
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Gainesville, Florida
    WCA Profile
    2008LOFT01
    YouTube
    Loftycuber
    Posts
    1,594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lorn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Lofty View Post
    you should learn how to solve the F2L. But it looks like you can already do that.
    How does it look like I can already do it?
    Because F2L is simply the first two layers. Therefore corners then edges solves the F2L. There are many different and fast ways to solve the F2L that are not Fridrich.
    Basically I just want to say that once you can do LBL and want to move on Fridrich is not the only path to take. So I think the next step should be learn some different methods and find which one you like best.
    I actually made my post about 2 minutes before his 41 second solve.
    Last edited by Lofty; 04-25-2009 at 08:39 PM.
    OH Records: Single: 9.xx Average of 12: 16.13 Average of 5: 15.03
    www.loftycuber.110mb.com

  9. #119

    Default OLL PLL Help

    Right now my best is 33 seconds with f2l and then the rest of the beginner method [dan browns]. I want to get faster but there are around 50 something oll's that i dont want to memorize. i could do pll though theres only 13 or something. would it be possible to finish the last layer without the colors right like you would with the beginner method execpt the color would be in the right place.. sorry if this confuses you it does for me to haha.

    oh yea my average is around 50 seconds
    Last edited by tfkscores; 04-26-2009 at 08:25 AM. Reason: forgot my average

  10. #120
    Member sooland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Silicon Valley
    WCA Profile
    2009CHAN03
    YouTube
    huiyingw
    Posts
    55

    Default

    you should just learn the basic Olls, like the cross situations. You can use the begginer method to get to the cross on oll. On pll, learn the algorithm that gets you to edge situations, and you can learn 3 algorithms to solve the cube. This is intermediate fridrich, and then from there you can slowly learn new algorithms for more common situations.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •