Mastermind2368
Member
As far as I know, I don't think anyone has. But if we put in a reg to fix it now, we won't need to deal with it.Was anyone ever able to pull something like this off?
As far as I know, I don't think anyone has. But if we put in a reg to fix it now, we won't need to deal with it.Was anyone ever able to pull something like this off?
For scrambling, their should be a test 20-25 questions long, giving a scramble and asking what the UBR piece is after doing the scramble.
No I don't think their should be. I have been trying to earn a licence for the amateur radio and I noticed that you have a test you can take before you can get on air. What if at every comp you go over all the regs needed for the events happening at a comp. If you want to run, you take a test based on the regs about how to run. It probably will only need no more the 20 questions. The question will be about, "Where you find the cubes to run." "Where do you read the name to call out?" ect...
For scrambling, their should be a test 20-25 questions long, giving a scramble and asking what the UBR piece is after doing the scramble.
Judging will be 25 long , asking +2 penalties, Dnf's ect...
As far as I know, I don't think anyone has. But if we put in a reg to fix it now, we won't need to deal with it.
I see your point, but because there should be a blocker between the solver and the cube the blindfold become irrelevant.Well, this being said, should blindfolds be tested?