Cool...?
Ok couple things here. Limit doesn't mean averages can't be below that, that's just a limit for global. Even now sub 3 singles are possible. I don't see how sub 4 averages just aren't gonna happen.
I too look for a fingertricky solution using a speedsolving method for FMC...
Influencing DR is very important
EDIT: Like the same could be said about the xcross. Solving cross than first pair is almost always going to be worse than solving it directly.
OH is a different event from 3x3. The 100m in a decathlon is the same as a 100m race. Your analogy is flawed.
Also why do you bring this up even? This was 1.5 years ago and nobody is debating this lol.
I mean that's ok. Some people will go off of just world rankings alone to determine the best method, which isn't really good for various reasons. Try both and see what you like better, but don't just blindly trust people (including me).
I will greatly disagree.
M moves get awkward: Practice. MU can be done OH very close to the same speed as 2H
Much better fingertricks: Not really. RrU is very good, and no rotations
But he's not asking for that, he's asking how to get better at Roux.
Kian has some good videos. Learn how...
I don't understand this argument. Why do how noncubers view things affect cubers' rules? It's already established that it gets messy.
as for the "puts Roux and CFOP on an even playing field argument", why are the ways we solve the cube even relevant? The technical reason for a plus 2 is that if...
Seems like they're doing quite a bit of updates. Be patient and just know it might happen again.
BTW check out the new rankings page if you haven't already.
You're going to want to put it back in. Find where the missing piece is and take out a corner section next to it (start with the wing, then the centers, and the rest should come out easily). Put the internal piece back in place and put everything back in.